Business, Legal & Accounting Glossary
In most US states, a formula, pattern, physical device, idea, process, compilation of information or other information that 1) provides a business with a competitive advantage, and 2) is treated in a way that can reasonably be expected to prevent the public or competitors from learning about it, absent improper acquisition or theft.
A trade secret is information that is not known to the public, that its owner takes steps to keep from public knowledge and that has value because it is not known to the public. The owners of trade secrets can protect them using non-disclosure agreements, non-competition agreements and state trade and federal trade secrets statutes.
The Uniform Trade Secrets Act, as adopted by Ohio, defines a trade secret as:
information, including the whole or any portion or phase of any scientific or technical information, design, process, procedure, formula, pattern, compilation, program, device, method, technique, or improvement, or any business information or plans, financial information, or listing of names, addresses, or telephone numbers, that satisfies both of the following:
In a non-disclosure agreement (“NDA”), the parties are free to define the information that they intend to protect. Hence, the parties can define trade secrets broadly to cover additional information. In practice, however, NDAs tend to track the language of the Uniform Trade Secrets’ Act definitions.
The most common forms of trade secrets in employment litigation are customer lists and pricing information. Marketing plans, software, engineering drawings and other non-public information stored in electronic form under password protection will also likely qualify as trade secrets.
The Trade Secrets Act describes a violation in terms of “misappropriation.” A misappropriation means any of the following:
An employee who makes a copy of the employer’s password-protected customer list and sends a direct mail advertisement to each customer on the list for his or her new employer has misappropriated trade secrets. By definition, an employee who has access to an employer’s trade secret information acquires it under circumstances giving rise to a duty to maintain its secrecy. The information only obtains its trade secret status if the employer takes reasonable steps to keep it secret. Importantly, the new employer has also misappropriated the trade secrets, since the customer list used for its benefit was derived from a person (the employee) who had a duty to maintain its secrecy.
Some states have adopted the inevitable disclosure doctrine that allows an employer to enjoin an employee from accepting competitive employment, even in the absence of a non-competition agreement. Specifically, the inevitable disclosure doctrine states that an employee who is performing essentially the same work for a new employer, which work requires the knowledge and use of proprietary information, will find it difficult or impossible, not to use or disclose his former employer’s confidential information. In other words, trade secrets law has been applied to employees who have not actually committed a trade secret violation, if a court finds that it is inevitable that they will do so due to the nature of their job.
Some states have found that a customer list or other secret information contained only in the employee’s head is, nonetheless, a protectible trade secret. In those states, the employee does not have a defense that he or she actually took nothing. Rather, the court treats the memorized information the same as written information.
The trade secret owner can bring a civil action under the Trade Secret’s Act for an injunction, which is a court order directing the employee and new employer to stop using the trade secret information. If the parties violate the order, they are subject to civil contempt sanctions. Parties to non-disclosure agreements may also agree to an injunction in the event of a breach of the agreement.
In addition to an injunction, a trade secrets owner can seek money damages for the misappropriation. Ohio’s Uniform Trade Secret Act permits money damages that include both the actual loss caused by misappropriation and the unjust enrichment caused by misappropriation that is not taken into account in computing actual loss. In lieu of damages measured by any other methods, the damages caused by misappropriation may be measured by imposition of liability for a reasonable royalty that is equitable under the circumstances considering the loss to the complainant, the benefit to the misappropriator, or both, for a misappropriator’s unauthorized disclosure or use of a trade secret.
In addition, if willful and malicious misappropriation exists, the court may award punitive or exemplary damages in an amount not exceeding three times the monetary award, as well as reasonable attorneys’ fees. Conversely, if a party brings a trade secrets act claim in bad faith, the responding party can recover his or her attorneys’ fees as well.
Unlike the Trade Secrets Act remedies, the non-breaching party to an NDA cannot recover treble damages or attorneys’ fees. The non-breaching party can only recover lost profits and obtain an injunction against further breaches.
Trade Secrets Protection and NDAs restrict a person’s use of confidential information. Non-competition agreements, however, prevent a person from engaging in a particular activity for a certain time and in a certain area. Thus, a non-competition agreement can have significantly more adverse effects on an employee.
Non-competition agreements exist to protect legitimate employer interests. A widely recognized employer interest is the protection of employer trade secrets. Hence, courts tend to enforce non-competition agreements whose purpose is aimed at preventing an employee from, for example, engaging in a competing business through the use of the employer’s trade secrets.
The federal Economic Espionage Act makes the theft or misappropriation of trade secrets a crime. Covered misappropriation includes theft of trade secrets for the benefit of foreign powers and the theft of trade secrets for commercial or economic purposes regardless of who benefits. The Economic Espionage Act of 1996 applies outside of the United States where the offender is a U.S. citizen or any act occurred in the United States involving the misappropriation of the trade secret.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
Definitions for Trade Secret are sourced/syndicated and enhanced from:
This glossary post was last updated: 23rd April, 2020 | 1 Views.