A quotient verdict, also known as a quotient jury, occurs when jurors agree to reach a verdict by averaging their individual opinions rather than engaging in deliberations to reach a unanimous decision based on the evidence presented during a trial. This approach is generally considered improper and is often viewed as a violation of the jury’s duty to deliberate and weigh the evidence collectively. Quotient verdicts are not permitted in many jurisdictions, as they undermine the principles of fairness and the jury’s role in reaching a consensus based on the facts presented in court.
This site contains general legal information but does not constitute professional legal advice for your particular situation. Persuing this glossary does not create an attorney-client or legal adviser relationship. If you have specific questions, please consult a qualified attorney licensed in your jurisdiction.
This glossary post was last updated: 29th March, 2024.
To help you cite our definitions in your bibliography, here is the proper citation layout for the three major formatting styles, with all of the relevant information filled in.
- Page URL:https://dlssolicitors.com/define/quotient-verdict/
- Modern Language Association (MLA):Quotient Verdict. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. April 18, 2024 https://dlssolicitors.com/define/quotient-verdict/.
- Chicago Manual of Style (CMS):Quotient Verdict. dlssolicitors.com. DLS Solicitors. https://dlssolicitors.com/define/quotient-verdict/ (accessed: April 18, 2024).
- American Psychological Association (APA):Quotient Verdict. dlssolicitors.com. Retrieved April 18, 2024, from dlssolicitors.com website: https://dlssolicitors.com/define/quotient-verdict/
